Welcome to Everything Croton, a collection of all things Croton--our history, our homes, our issues, our businesses, our schools, our houses of worship--in short, EVERYTHING CROTON.
To: Village Planning Board
Courtesy of: Ms. Karen Stapleton
Hudson National Golf Club (HN) submitted a Wetlands Activity Permit (WAP) for a major golf course restoration, which was the subject of the 12.7.22 Water Control Commission (WCC) meeting. What I heard at that meeting strongly suggests that the PB should oversee all permits and applications submitted by HN.
Village Code 195-5 B, and Wetlands Law 227-7 F (1) state that the PB is the approving authority for any application involving property for which a special permit already exists. While Trustee Simon’s 12.27.22 email reports that Matrix Development LLC has withdrawn their solar application, the same cannot be said of HN. Their subdivision application remains active as does their application to amend the existing Special Permit for the golf course.
The 11.22.22 WCC letter said this WAP application is an Unlisted Action under SEQRA. At the meeting, Ms. Whitehead downgraded it to Type II ‘maintenance,’ thereby exempting this application from SEQRA requirements. I believe the WCC and Ms. Whitehead are wrong. This should be Type 1 and subject to a Long EAF.
The discussion at the 12.7.22 meeting strongly suggests that this is not regular ‘maintenance,’ but rather a major golf course restoration. HN’s Superintendent, Mr. Scales, stated that the pipes for HN’s existing irrigation system, much of which is currently in the wetlands buffer zone, will be capped off, the existing irrigation heads removed, and a new irrigation system installed after new trenches to accommodate it are dug within that wetlands buffer zone. He also said that the greens (18) will be rebuilt and relocated. That the 14th green will be enlarged. That 80+ sand bunkers will be rebuilt and relocated. That this major golf course restoration will require the creation and use of an additional half-acre or more site to stockpile materials.
Little of the scope of this major restoration appeared on either the WAP application signed by Mr. Scales or the Short Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) signed by Mr. Mastromonaco, HN’s Consulting Engineer. Mr. Mastromonaco also grossly underestimated the total acreage that would likely be disturbed. In a revised short EAF submitted just prior to the 12/7/22 meeting Mastromonaco added to the project’s scope, but did not again, disclose its entirety. He amended the area to be physically disturbed area as 9.5 acres.
9.5 acres should raise a red flag. Under SEQRA, actions that physically disturb 10 or more acres must be classified Type 1 and are subject to a Long EAF. The scope of this major golf course restoration suggests that more than 10 acres, some of it in the wetlands buffer zone, will be disturbed.
Also noteworthy is that besides stockpiling materials, both new and discarded on this half-acre+ site, Mr. Scales told the WCC that discarded materials which will be trucked ‘off-campus’ and dumped, would be classified as ‘clean fill.’ The WCC failed to require HN to provide soil sample tests.
When questioning Mr. Scales, one WCC member said, “…not to get too deep in the weeds,” when it is, in fact, the WCC’s job to do just that. To go ‘deep into the weeds,’ to ‘drill-down’ and subject HN’s WAP application to a ‘hard look.’
Given its history, all HN’s permits and applications should be under a microscope. And the PB should be the approving authority.
Thank you.
Paula Chabrowe